This is the first of a three-part series based on a real-world engagement: a company that scaled from $40M to $1B in annual revenue in just five years, and the security program that had to grow with it. This is a story about building high-performance operating systems where security, standards, architecture, and performance act as enablers rather than constraints. Part 1: Earning credibility before you’ve earned authority. Part 2: Blurring the lines - Security at the SRE and Operations level. Part 3: Wrapping the gift - Transparency and agency. The Inflection Point A few years back, AMTI was at the heart of a fascinating corporate challenge. I was serving as a fractional CISO and advisor for a company standing at a critical inflection point. ...

This is the second of a three-part series based on a real-world engagement: a company that scaled from $40M to $1B in annual revenue in just five years, and the security program that had to grow with it. This is a story about building high-performance operating systems where security, standards, architecture, and performance act as enablers rather than constraints. Part 1: Earning credibility before you’ve earned authority. Part 2: Blurring the lines - Security at the SRE and Operations level. Part 3: Wrapping the gift - Transparency and agency. From Trust to Reliance ...

Most security programs are built around preventing bad things from happening. That’s necessary but insufficient. At AMTI, where I served as CTO and led infrastructure security for a multi-tenant cloud serving customers from single-VM deployments to enterprise DRaaS contracts spanning hundreds of miles of metro fiber, I learned that mature security is about resilience: the capacity to detect, contain, and recover faster than adversaries can escalate. The Visibility Problem at Scale Operating a cloud service provider on your own ASN creates a specific governance challenge: you’re the abuse contact, but in a GDPR-compliant architecture, you have no visibility into customer data. Encrypted traffic is opaque by design. This constraint forced architectural discipline: we couldn’t inspect our way to security, so we had to instrument our way there. ...

1/5 — The Inception Series: Security Assurance — URE Case — 1/5 Start from the beginning: you’re here. Next: 2/5 — Trust Boundaries This is the first of five short posts on Security Assurance Engineering. The goal is simple: separate security intent from security proof, and show what “assurance” looks like when you treat a system as real—owned, changing, and measurable. I’ll use URE as the working surface. URE is the platform where I publish research notes and operating practice generated in my lab—work that started as a few shared threads with friends and peers, and eventually became worth “productizing” into something durable and navigable. ...

2/5 — Trust Boundaries Series: Security Assurance — URE Case — 2/5 Start from the beginning: 1/5 — The Inception Next: 3/5 — The Design In mature environments, we don’t start with implementation. We start with boundaries and ownership. Before anyone spins up “a simple website/blog,” we make three things explicit: What is the system? (scope and components) Who can change it? (identities and permissions) What must always remain true? (invariants + guardrails) Security should be intentional. The goal is to create guardrails the rest of the team can rely on—so delivery is fast and the system stays trustworthy under change. ...

3/5 — The Design Series: Security Assurance — URE Case — 3/5 Start from the beginning: 1/5 — The Inception Next: 4/5 — Security as an Enabler (and “forward agency”) Design is where “a simple website” becomes a real system. Not because the pages are complex—but because the moment you publish, you inherit real dependencies: DNS, build pipelines, third parties, telemetry, and the drift that comes with change. So before we build anything, we do one unglamorous thing: ...

4/5 — Security as an Enabler (and “forward agency”) Series: Security Assurance — URE Case — 4/5 Start from the beginning: 1/5 — The Inception Next: 5/5 — Conclusion — Assurance Without Theater Security enables the business when it shows up with agency: not just identifying risk, but carrying enough context to propose solutions that preserve the mission. That requires a maturity shift. When security arrives late, it often speaks in “non-English.” It blocks because the system is already committed to choices no one can defend. ...

5/5 — Conclusion — Assurance Without Theater Series: Security Assurance — URE Case — 5/5 Start from the beginning: 1/5 — The Inception Security Assurance Engineering is not a side quest. It’s not a compliance ritual. And it’s not a “security team thing.” It’s what turns security from intent into proof—in systems that are owned, changing, and measurable. Across these chapters, the arc is consistent: Part 1/5 (Inception): Architecture sets the invariants. Assurance proves they still hold under change. Part 2/5 (Trust Boundaries): If the boundary isn’t explicit, you don’t have a system—you have assumptions. Part 3/5 (Design): The tedious questions aren’t bureaucracy; they are how you prevent accidental scope and irreversible drift. Part 4/5 (Security as Enabler): Done well, security doesn’t slow delivery—it restores optionality and keeps the mission intact under real pressure. The takeaway is simple: ...

Every company says security is a priority. Every company also ships under pressure. The gap between those two statements is where businesses bleed. I’ve watched organizations with excellent engineers and serious budgets still get humbled by the same pattern: teams optimize locally (features, velocity, “my backlog”), while the system pays globally (incidents, outages, churn, reputational drag). When things go south, it rarely takes a cinematic attacker or a once-in-a-decade failure. ...