<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Speculative Decoding Benchmarks on URE</title><link>https://ure.us/tags/speculative-decoding-benchmark/</link><description>Recent content in Speculative Decoding Benchmarks on URE</description><generator>Hugo -- 0.169.0</generator><language>en-us</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://ure.us/tags/speculative-decoding-benchmark/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>DFlash 2 vs MTP Speculative Decoding on RTX PRO 6000</title><link>https://ure.us/articles/dflash2-vs-mtp-speculative-decoding-rtx-pro-6000/</link><pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://ure.us/articles/dflash2-vs-mtp-speculative-decoding-rtx-pro-6000/</guid><description>A second model on the card drafting for the first: DFlash 2 vs built-in MTP on a dense 27B NVFP4, one RTX PRO 6000, real prompts, acceptance and joules logged.</description></item></channel></rss>